About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Wednesday, January 11, 2006 - 11:47pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
She is beautiful. But why did she need a competition to tell her that? This is something that I shall never understand, I guess.

Post 1

Friday, January 13, 2006 - 5:35amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Nothing in the article implies that Singh needed a beauty contest to tell her that she is beautiful. Why infer it?

There are many conceivable good and even admirable reasons for entering a beauty contest, especially one not limited to physical beauty, and of these many in which being declared most beautiful would be a means rather than a final end. Beauty contests, even with a second-place finish, don't seem to have harmed Aishwarya Rai's career. And would The Fountainhead, or beauty via health, have received such notice without Singh's win?

But let us suppose that a contest's pronouncements were also, for someone, ends in themselves. Would having such an end necessarily be base? Compliments are part of courtship ritual; need they lack primal importance? And what of the metaphysics-reinforcing implications; ought life be without them?

The article says too little about Singh's contest to be certain of any of the conventional shallowness parodied in movies. It ought to be possible, with the Web, to conduct contests in significant depth without great expense or distraction.

Nothing about beauty contests per se makes them pointless.


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.